Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D8B1648184 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:09:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from misc.wordtothewise.com ([184.105.179.154] helo=m.wordtothewise.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SDgGN-0006zR-FW for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:09:31 +0000 Received: from platter.wordtothewise.com (204.11.227.194.static.etheric.net [204.11.227.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: steve) by m.wordtothewise.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 158C52E192 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: Adding links to alternate versions of doc pages From: Steve Atkins In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:09:12 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <644C6503-6A40-4557-9618-992FBB9E5DA3@blighty.com> References: <1332958954-sup-332@alvh.no-ip.org> <1333040870.4554.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <30522FD7-A95C-4FB8-98C9-167523E17485@blighty.com> To: Pg Docs X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201203/53 X-Sequence-Number: 7252 On Mar 30, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:58, Steve Atkins wrote: >=20 >> Having all the specific-version pages use that to point to the >> non-version URL might help. >=20 > Ah, you mean basically a link on every page going back to /current/? >=20 > That does bring back the whole problem of filenames/URLs being > different between different versions of course.. Yup. It's much the same issue, so it'd be something to try as part of the "add links to other versions" exercise. Simpler, as it'd be = reasonable to add rel=3D"canonical" pointing to the current page only if the = versioned page has the identical filename. i.e. /docs///tutorial-start.html would have in it's for all versions, including the most recent. It's sort of lying to the search engine categorizer, but might hint it to do what we'd like. Whether it's a good idea or not, I'm not sure. It'd be nice to get some hints from someone who understands SEO. Cheers, Steve