Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fANHYvm66146
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:34:57 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fANHYoc06792;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:34:50 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: SGML makefile 
In-reply-to: <200111231705.fANH5hB25719@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200111231705.fANH5hB25719@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:05:43 -0500"
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:34:49 -0500
Message-ID: <6789.1006536889@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200111/79
X-Sequence-Number: 1152

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I added a comment to document the purpose.  Thanks.

Um ... is it portable to stick a comment into the body of a make
rule like that?  Shell comments and make comments aren't always
the same.

			regards, tom lane