From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel <fhagur@gmail.com>
cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Limitation of prepared statement name
In-reply-to: 
 <CAGHTAeMG7LRBu+sq5Xoz9TKMuhghzpG5uu9FkX=nATC4X4JBmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGHTAeOxqeojgvWEuciRvq1xbZYHKK6mGzs=g2rQ8upM3mwVWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <28416.1535473275@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAGHTAeMG7LRBu+sq5Xoz9TKMuhghzpG5uu9FkX=nATC4X4JBmg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel <fhagur@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:23:14 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <6817.1535639298.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:28:18 -0400
Message-ID: <6818.1535639298@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel <fhagur@gmail.com> writes:
> Em ter, 28 de ago de 2018 às 18:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
>> You could as well argue that every single page that describes creating
>> any sort of object ought to repeat this information.  I doubt that people
>> would find that to be an improvement.

> I'll never argue repeating the same information everywhere in the docs but
> a good solution would be to link the identifiers section everytime an
> identifier is used in the docs.

That seems like an impossible level of clutter, too.

			regards, tom lane