public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Moser, Glen G <[email protected]>
To: Stephen Frost <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Is this still accurate?
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 17:57:37 +0000
Message-ID: <68e5e2554e2240c6a22bd384fa7c9659@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <4fe11dc1b660433594624b280b8ad832@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
<3d7cd4673a80438798ad20b83411e3ca@SC58MEXGP001.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
<1646547df04f4555a548ad7815208d5f@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
<[email protected]>
That's really the gist of the concern from a team member of mine. Not that the 4TB number is wrong but that it could be misleading to assume that 4TB is some sort of upper bound.
That's how this concern was relayed to me and I am just following up.
Glen Moser
Director, Reporting & Analytics, NOC
Charter Communications
636.387.6888 (O) | 314.308.5680 (M)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Frost [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 11:55 AM
To: Moser, Glen G <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Is this still accurate?
Greetings,
* Moser, Glen G ([email protected]) wrote:
> Can someone confirm the accuracy of the information found at https://www.postgresql.org/about/?
>
> Specifically the maximum data values in the screen shot below...it seems as though this documentation might be out of date.
The part you highlighted was:
"There are active PostgreSQL systems in production environments that manage in excess of 4 terabytes of data."
Which is pretty accurate, I know of some myself that are larger than 4TB. That 4TB number isn't a limit of any kind and the sentence says "in excess of" meaning that there are databases larger than that.
There's actually some which are quite a bit larger than that, in fact.
We could bump the number up there or remove the sentence, but I don't think there's anything inaccurate about the statement.
Thanks!
Stephen
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
view thread (11+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: RE: Is this still accurate?
In-Reply-To: <68e5e2554e2240c6a22bd384fa7c9659@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox