Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by hub.org (8.10.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9J1hIP91552
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:43:18 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id e9J1h8507013;
	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:43:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: Marc Liyanage <liyanage@access.ch>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: PostgreSQL solaris faq 
In-reply-to: <200010182118.RAA17847@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200010182118.RAA17847@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:18:24 -0400"
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:43:08 -0400
Message-ID: <7010.971919788@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200010/25
X-Sequence-Number: 340

Instead of putting this in the FAQ, why don't we fix the solaris
template files!?

			regards, tom lane