Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ubNAP-0004IR-5u for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:40:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ubNAN-00AScx-0F for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:40:39 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ubNAM-00AScm-Ok for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:40:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ubNAL-007GwT-2W for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:40:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 56EHeZdx702139; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:40:35 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: Laurenz Albe , petermittere@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary In-reply-to: References: <175223006802.3157505.14764328206246105568@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <15139c5d218754350e4870062f90ff0e85490290.camel@cybertec.at> <270191.1752420426@sss.pgh.pa.us> <097e693ea6cc3541cbcd72c915d7d492c26930c0.camel@cybertec.at> <456003.1752442676@sss.pgh.pa.us> <458204.1752443813@sss.pgh.pa.us> <685003.1752506254@sss.pgh.pa.us> <690858.1752509326@sss.pgh.pa.us> <697664.1752512964@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" message dated "Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:31:41 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <702137.1752514835.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:40:35 -0400 Message-ID: <702138.1752514835@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "David G. Johnston" writes: > If we accept that we use the words statement and command interchangeably > then the sole remaining use of command here sticks out because now we have > to explain why commands are different from statements. I'd rather just > remove the parenthetical. It's poorly clarifying a point that it seems you > don't want to clarify more fully here. [ shrug... ] I'm inclined to go back to the "command message" wording then. I don't find "client-issued statement" to be helpful at all; in particular, it's flat wrong for the multi-statement-query-message case, because surely all those statements are client-issued. I'm okay with this text leaving out nitpicky details, but it should leave the reader with a mental model that more or less matches reality. regards, tom lane