X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6335E46CE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:06:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59620-01 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:06:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F755E46C3 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:06:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OK6Al3007146; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:06:11 -0400 (EDT) To: John DeSoi Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: docs correction (8.0 beta) In-reply-to: <007C2580-F20C-11D8-BD07-000A95B03262@icx.net> References: <007C2580-F20C-11D8-BD07-000A95B03262@icx.net> Comments: In-reply-to John DeSoi message dated "Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:17:16 -0400" Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:06:10 -0400 Message-ID: <7145.1093377970@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/44 X-Sequence-Number: 2504 John DeSoi writes: > From the example below and looking at scan.c, it seems that nested > block comments are supported. You are confusing SQL and PL/pgSQL. regards, tom lane