Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8882E0255 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:36:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33809-07 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:36:00 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174882E0325 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:35:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m25HZrvJ000719; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:35:53 -0500 (EST) To: Bruce Momjian cc: Richard Huxton , David Fetter , PostgreSQL Docs Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres In-reply-to: <200803051502.m25F2fm03349@momjian.us> References: <200803051502.m25F2fm03349@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:02:41 -0500" Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:35:53 -0500 Message-ID: <718.1204738553@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/13 X-Sequence-Number: 4825 Bruce Momjian writes: > Richard Huxton wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > David Fetter wrote: >>> If you really need to embed an >>> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent >>> SQLite >> >> or Firebird >> > for the purpose. >> >> Just to be fair. > sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding. Is it really a good idea to be recommending particular other products? And don't forget that the next thing on that list would be mysql. If we need a FAQ entry on this at all, I'd stop after David's first two sentences. regards, tom lane