Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB5663402F for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:31:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09588-10 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:31:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.28]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7065633E32 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:31:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl (dovemail14.xs4all.nl [194.109.26.16]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o32MUwVl058777; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:31:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from er@xs4all.nl) Received: from 156.83.0.57 (SquirrelMail authenticated user er) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:31:04 +0200 Message-ID: <724fd992adbd25aa2528edc7d6efb7e7.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <5261.1270245874@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1270189232.5018.7.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org> <4835.1270244089@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7c517ea00ee071521b9b28022d901018.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <5261.1270245874@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:31:04 +0200 Subject: Re: PDF build issue with 9.0 Alpha5 From: "Erik Rijkers" To: "Tom Lane" Cc: Devrim =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= , "pgsql-docs" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.604 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.605, BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/19 X-Sequence-Number: 5418 On Sat, April 3, 2010 00:04, Tom Lane wrote: > "Erik Rijkers" writes: >> This is CentOS 5.2, > >> yum list *jade* >> Installed Packages >> jadetex.noarch 3.12-13.1.1 installed >> openjade.x86_64 1.3.2-27 installed > > Hmm. Some rooting about in Red Hat's CVS says that that should be > practically indistinguishable from the 3.13 version shipping in current > Fedora. In particular there is no real difference in jadetex.dtx in the > two versions, so they should both eat about the same number of strings. > > Could you try this experiment: > > 1. make postgres-A4.tex-pdf > > 2. Edit the resulting postgres-A4.tex-pdf to insert a line > > \tracingstats=2 > > at the top. > > 3. make postgres-A4.pdf > > 4. In the resulting postgres-A4.log file, find the bit that looks like > this, and send it to the list: > > Here is how much of TeX's memory you used: > 245829 strings out of 245830 > 1743620 string characters out of 1810852 > 628334 words of memory out of 1500000 > 174597 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+200000 > 99198 words of font info for 149 fonts, out of 1200000 for 2000 > 645 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191 > 28i,13n,45p,1206b,3965s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,6000p,200000b,15000s > Here is how much of TeX's memory you used: 246467 strings out of 246489 1749307 string characters out of 1824395 499695 words of memory out of 1000000 174744 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+200000 99198 words of font info for 149 fonts, out of 500000 for 2000 580 hyphenation exceptions out of 1000 28i,13n,45p,1206b,3963s stack positions out of 1500i,500n,5000p,200000b,15000s PDF statistics: 113474 PDF objects out of 300000 84838 named destinations out of 131072 31417 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 65536