Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5748634341
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  9 Apr 2009 19:23:57 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 49921-09 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  9 Apr 2009 19:23:50 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A845633A60
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2009 19:23:56 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n39MNfSs007359;
	Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index 
In-reply-to: <200904092159.n39Lxh201358@momjian.us> 
References: <200904092159.n39Lxh201358@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:59:42 -0400"
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:23:41 -0400
Message-ID: <7358.1239315821@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.143 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.143
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200904/30
X-Sequence-Number: 5118

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Did unnest() get added properly too?

Yes, I included it in the patch.

			regards, tom lane