Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93889FB592 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:14:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57084-02 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:13:46 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808E59FB528 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:13:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1CFDj85007493; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:13:45 -0500 (EST) To: mario.splivalo@mobart.hr cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 'FOUND' keyword not found in index (pg8.2) In-reply-to: <1171280583.17666.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1171280583.17666.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Comments: In-reply-to Mario Splivalo message dated "Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:43:02 +0100" Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:13:45 -0500 Message-ID: <7492.1171293225@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.133 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200702/10 X-Sequence-Number: 4141 Mario Splivalo writes: > Am I missing something here, or 'FOUND' keyword should be enlisted in > Index? Probably. The indexing of the PL chapters seems pretty weak in general; anyone want to submit a patch? regards, tom lane