Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 01:23:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Message-ID: <753685717.240313.1685057033384@office.mailbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <ad1ccc2122be3a023543c6cbe0b35e15fe088e45.camel@cybertec.at>
References: 
 <CAL3CXNMes1r4s78QnMAekj9W1nchGH7dbq86wyEFB2gxqQrJ-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1667253069.131800.1684935988763@office.mailbox.org>
 <2053109544.160895.1684955437950@office.mailbox.org>
 <680324ce9104e3d8e9d93b040c152b8bd47b361e.camel@cybertec.at>
 <1217818053.151381.1684997995236@office.mailbox.org>
 <ad1ccc2122be3a023543c6cbe0b35e15fe088e45.camel@cybertec.at>
Subject: Re: Cross-Product JOIN?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/753685717.240313.1685057033384%40office.mailbox.org>
Precedence: bulk

> On 25/05/2023 23:46 CEST Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 08:59 +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > > Since we are talking about Cartesian products: is the term "Cartesian join"
> > > used anywhere?
> >
> > Not in the docs:
>
> I was trying to be funny.  The Cartesian product of {Cartesian,cross} and
> {product,join} would be {Cartesian product,Cartesian join,cross product,cross join}.

And someone beat you to it and apparently planted the joke in the codebase.

(Good one, but unfortunately hard to tell apart from a serious question.)

--
Erik