Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jct9c-0000La-Mo for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 16:07:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jct9b-0001Zz-FQ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 16:07:11 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jct9b-0001Zs-9c for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 16:07:11 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jct9X-0004ZC-Hk for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 16:07:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 04OG74Xd007754; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:07:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: rajkumar820999@gmail.com cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: ERROR: (host) should be replaced by (hostnogssenc). In-reply-to: <159032426170.7030.13897325525866864814@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <159032426170.7030.13897325525866864814@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Sun, 24 May 2020 12:44:21 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7751.1590336424.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 12:07:04 -0400 Message-ID: <7753.1590336424@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > Under the topic "Encrypting Data Across A Network", I think there seems to > be a documentation error. > ERROR: (host) should be replaced by (hostnogssenc). > The pg_hba.conf file allows administrators to specify which hosts can use > non-encrypted connections (host) and which require GSSAPI-encrypted > connections (hostgssenc). Also, clients can specify that they connect to > servers only on GSSAPI-encrypted connections (gssencmode=require). I think it's correct as it stands. hostnogssenc would have the semantics "hosts that MUST use non-encrypted connections". If that were actually a useful option, maybe it would be worth lengthening this description to mention all three options ... but it seems OK as-is to me. regards, tom lane