Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2JMbaN78127;
	Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:37:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2JMbXt07775;
	Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:37:34 -0500 (EST)
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:37:33 -0500
Message-ID: <7772.985041453@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200103/96
X-Sequence-Number: 530

Is it really necessary to maintain identical text in the test README
file and in the SGML docs?  I'm sorely tempted to remove the README
rather than double-editing yet again.

			regards, tom lane