Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBBHj8m39827 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:45:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBBHjPZ07787; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:45:25 -0500 (EST) To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Bruce Momjian , Thomas Lockhart , "He Weiping (Laser Henry)" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: typo found. In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:25:13 +0100" Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:45:25 -0500 Message-ID: <7784.976556725@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200012/24 X-Sequence-Number: 71 Peter Eisentraut writes: > The way it is now (before your patch/after backout) is correct. Agreed. The entry in question is for oprrsortop, which certainly applies to the right-hand type not the left-hand. I do have a gripe with the entry just above that for "oprnegate": it defines the oprnegate field as linking to the "inverse" operator. This is not correct for the generally understood meaning of inverse. I'd say just write "Negator of this operator, if any". If anyone isn't sure about that, they can read about it in xoper.html ... but "inverse" is likely to leave people believing the wrong thing. regards, tom lane