X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08983D1F440
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:33:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 96268-05
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:33:23 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11653D1F482
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:29:38 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7ELTa5H007819
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:29:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Inconsistencies in our SGML output
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:29:36 -0400
Message-ID: <7818.1060896576@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200308/47
X-Sequence-Number: 1907

Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference,
	 <xref linkend="reference">
renders as "Part VI" here:
	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html
and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation":
	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html
Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems
overly verbose to me.

Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql
chapter,
	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html
Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1?  It seems to be made
with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections.

			regards, tom lane