X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFBC3A1ADF for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:34:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21396-07 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:34:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C813A1AC1 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:33:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBK0XtJJ008097; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:33:56 -0500 (EST) To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Mark Kirkwood , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Docs build failure on plpgsql.sgml In-reply-to: <20041220001431.GA1988@dcc.uchile.cl> References: <41C5F66E.1020005@coretech.co.nz> <16998.1103494319@sss.pgh.pa.us> <41C61097.4020701@coretech.co.nz> <20041220001431.GA1988@dcc.uchile.cl> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:14:31 -0300" Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:33:55 -0500 Message-ID: <8096.1103502835@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.004 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/30 X-Sequence-Number: 2726 Alvaro Herrera writes: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the >> stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's: >> >> $ rpm -qa|grep docbook >> docbook-dtds-1.0-25 >> docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4 > Peter announced just the other day he wants the docs to be built with > stylesheets 1.79 ... Mark's versions are the same as what I have on an up-to-date Fedora Core 3 box. (And I did duplicate his failure upon trying ... I'd not tried to build the docs on that box lately.) If 1.78 is pickier than 1.79, I think it's good to keep ourselves honest by making sure that the docs build against 1.78. We can say that 1.79 wins if differences of visual presentation come up, but as far as the markup correctness is concerned, better tighter than looser. regards, tom lane