Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f92DVFn55966 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 09:31:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f92DVAI08105; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 09:31:10 -0400 (EDT) To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: PostgreSQL Development Subject: Re: CVS changes In-reply-to: <20011002083523.I77860-100000@mail1.hub.org> References: <20011002083523.I77860-100000@mail1.hub.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Marc G. Fournier" message dated "Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:36:15 -0400" Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 09:31:09 -0400 Message-ID: <8102.1002029469@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200110/130 X-Sequence-Number: 13872 "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: >> I would like to resolve the 12 hour lag for CVSup and anoncvs service, > It should never have been 12hrs ... I had it set for 4 ... but, I have > drop'd it down to hourly effective this morning ... That sounds like a good setting for anoncvs service. But I think Thomas (and any other committers who use cvsup) still need a cvsup server running on the master cvs machine. Even a 1-hour lag is too much when you are trying to commit changes. regards, tom lane