X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BD4DA5CE
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:47:50 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 27262-07
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:47:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37F1DA5C1
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:47:46 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9GGljkT008523;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:47:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Volkan YAZICI <volkan.yazici@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? 
In-reply-to: <200510161552.j9GFqvI14316@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200510161552.j9GFqvI14316@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:52:57 -0400"
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:47:44 -0400
Message-ID: <8522.1129481264@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006]
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200510/45
X-Sequence-Number: 3290

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Volkan YAZICI wrote:
>> Will PQregisterThreadLock() - which is defined globally in
>> src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c - be documented?

> Yes, it should be documented.

Really?  Do we intend applications to call it?

			regards, tom lane