Message-ID: <8741f3ce-6e42-0f71-2096-d7e7d251582e@oss.nttdata.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:22:06 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
Subject: Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
Content-Language: en-US
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
References: <51b76596-ab4f-c9f0-1005-60ce1bb14b6b@oss.nttdata.com>
 <1348387.1641573716@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
In-Reply-To: <1348387.1641573716@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8741f3ce-6e42-0f71-2096-d7e7d251582e%40oss.nttdata.com>
Precedence: bulk


On 2022/01/08 1:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>> In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.
> 
>> - Auxiliary process
>> - Startup process
>> - WAL receiver
> 
> I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
> of being silly.  +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
> since that's not obviously a process.

Yes, you're right. So I pushed the patch that adds "(process)"
only to the glossary term "WAL receiver". Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION