Received: from smtp.enteract.com (thor.enteract.com [207.229.143.11]) by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id BAA06911 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 01:09:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hal@hippo.roxor.org) Received: (qmail 10126 invoked from network); 10 Jan 1999 06:09:38 -0000 Received: from hal-isdn-1.sa.enteract.com (HELO hippo.roxor.org) (207.229.136.105) by thor.enteract.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 1999 06:09:38 -0000 Received: (from hal@localhost) by hippo.roxor.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA10245; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 00:08:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hal) To: docs@postgresql.org Subject: Other SQL web sites From: Hal Snyder Date: 10 Jan 1999 00:08:26 -0600 Message-ID: <87ogo7acdh.fsf@hippo.roxor.org> Lines: 67 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.44/Emacs 20.3 I looked at four commercial SQL server sites: Informix, MS, Oracle, and Sybase. Recent postings to this list have considered other web sites, in an attempt to define what we would like to see in the PostgreSQL site. A friend suggested looking at sites for other SQL servers, to look for common elements. The idea is not to copy slavishly, but to see if there might be something that a user would expect or find familiar. 1. All sites use a dual navigation-bar approach, using a bar on top for going about the corporation at large, and a bar at left for the immediate "children" of the current page. I don't think we need the top bar. 2. Only the Microsoft pages could expand when I widened my browser window. The others just grew a bigger blank area at right. 3. All but the Microsoft page seemed horribly cluttered to me, with Oracle the worst offender. 4. There *is* common content in the second tier (topics listed in the home page's left navigation bar). It goes something like this: Contact Us Development Downloads Partners Product Information Search Support For us, "partners" would be related open source projects, including Apache, Java, ODBC, Perl, PHP, Pike, Python, Roxen, Tcl/Tk. We don't have a point of contact for questions. Yes, we have mailing lists, live and archived, but no place where someone can direct a question - which is why Marc and I see non web-related questions on a regular basis coming to webmaster@postgresql.org. Our web site should have a search engine, but that's just a weekend with htdig once the content stabilizes. Comments on the individual sites- http://www.informix.com Slowest of the sites, when I checked. Putrescent mustard color for navbars. http://www.microsoft.com/sql Good per-page information density. Good balance of graphics to text (minimal gratuitous imagery) Left navbar mostly constant from page to page (bad). http://www.oracle.com Way too much stuff per page. Red-on-white color scheme makes me think of First Aid kits. Two-tier left navbar with second tier triggered by mouseovers (uses too much space). Children of home page have gratuitous color change mousevers in navbar. http://www.sybase.com Explanatory mouseovers for left navbar (good). --- Hal