Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4DB9FA2AE for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:26:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68365-02 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:26:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mtao02.charter.net (mtao02.charter.net [209.225.8.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7709FB429 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:26:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from aa02.charter.net ([10.20.200.154]) by mtao02.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070726152635.DVWY9370.mtao02.charter.net@aa02.charter.net>; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:26:35 -0400 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (really [66.188.165.91]) by aa02.charter.net with ESMTP id <20070726152635.SPDA26124.aa02.charter.net@[10.0.1.3]>; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:26:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46A8B01F.6000802@commandprompt.com> References: <46A81854.1010606@commandprompt.com> <5AAC03DB-B1BA-43CE-AC6F-3EE9311BF7CC@seespotcode.net> <46A8B01F.6000802@commandprompt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <895BBED3-F32C-403D-B822-527FA5828956@seespotcode.net> Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Glaesemann Subject: Re: Links wrong in docs Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:26:32 -0500 To: "Joshua D. Drake" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Chzlrs: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/17 X-Sequence-Number: 4344 On Jul 26, 2007, at 9:30 , Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Michael Glaesemann wrote: >> On Jul 25, 2007, at 22:43 , Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> I noticed the other day that if you are viewing the release notes >>> for a particular version that the prev / next links are wrong. >>> E.g., If I am reading 8.1.8 and want to read 8.1.9 I have to hit >>> previous, instead of next. >> I think it's because the releases are listed newest first, > > I know *why* :). It is still wrong :) What's your proposed fix? Change the order of the release notes? Change the meaning of the Next/Previous buttons? I understand what you're getting at, but I don't see a solution that really improves things. Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net