Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCtfW-0007kj-Lb for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:52:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCtfU-0000iD-UQ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:52:24 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCtfU-0000hc-Gs for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:52:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iCtfR-0002me-W1 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:52:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x8OMqIbK008985; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:52:18 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Alexander Lakhin , "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Fix contributor name-related inconsistencies in release-12.sgml In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:02:49 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8983.1569365538.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:52:18 -0400 Message-ID: <8984.1569365538@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 2019-09-23 13:08, Alexander Lakhin wrote: >> While translating Release Notes for version 12 I found some >> inconsistencies with contributor names. > We had discussed this in previous years and resolved that we use the > forms that these individuals use when posting to these mailing lists, in > whichever order they prefer. So as far as I'm concerned, the forms > listed in the release notes for PG10 and PG11 are canonical and should > continue to be used. I have no strong feelings either way, so feel free to undo whatever you think should be undone. I have noted that many of our Japanese contributors show a different name order in their From: line than in their signature/footer, so it's not entirely clear which preference they're expressing. regards, tom lane