Received: from mail.postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0OE1rq07645
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:01:53 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org)
Received: from sectorbase2.sectorbase.com ([208.48.122.131])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0NIWo089321
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:32:50 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM)
Received: by sectorbase2.sectorbase.com with Internet Mail Service
	(5.5.2653.19) id <DG1W4QHX>; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:11:16 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D32AE@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com>
From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
To: "'Oliver Elphick'" <olly@lfix.co.uk>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] WAL documentation
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:32:42 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Archive-Number: 200101/97
X-Sequence-Number: 232

> The CHECKPOINT command forces a checkpoint at the point at which the
> command is issued. The next automatic checkpoint will happen 
> the default time after the forced checkpoint.

No, postmaster has no means now to know about when forced checkpoint
was made.

Vadim