Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lu8LQ-0003aK-KR for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:51:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lu8LP-0001dL-Kx for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:51:11 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lu8LP-0001dD-FN for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:51:11 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lu8LI-00032u-QJ for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:51:10 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id g8so14216851ejx.1 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 23:51:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybertec-at.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8bo6YXL+w+D+NEu9wANvMo0b8IGPWesNAVGJLAcbXVo=; b=TlWIi3irsAJiKbv1xlmjPSY4FN7G1IjdTcPHKKrJ749fOc2Kmzk0KEqrLMtomv0bZA len8pwl/qHPYK6xtimP5ykEx4pSsAusDz/XIh7POhQi8W3SXz6CRbO38kivNHmt94AKh UA7WUS9WhennWPJrD4+tJyIORBhdzxvO+F3Bsc53WQHmYBRuwS+oWMpyzp15Patkf8xU B1xKlKO6Syr3t45PtPOMIHrUqR1UmgEevBrXgpKZuANwwszTljyRwoY06msrSIPqlNgX femEIxMjdcNliXJXkvZeUvTJBdlWd8f1gf5M8alRJn3jP3vFqBbGAth2lgE2D2tMJ+xF nO4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8bo6YXL+w+D+NEu9wANvMo0b8IGPWesNAVGJLAcbXVo=; b=DwmjzOzTZcSwNwmxkBtI9AE3crAJBktJhWj4UJctpIlOibWo4ruajyhwEJESWmjhjd ix52hhiOXuqxXUoWTfkZkk8/1IdzN838sPC+z2F6i0PGevO4x3QmSpnlErfhl9kShsgc 4/zcFlnG5RvJqlJ+FIfy4a7qJ5CIPFXeJI7HlWmZRWBW5WLfbsF422KbRxX5/b/Vu8Ek FKlToC4V+9WLB74YcX2jqXDkkTM3CtpO5ADzoyT9gBd0Wwf0c2GZdw95CqeUvMqYSPjy TdachvgLNkAvR9Qzn6YWRlqq2Y+Z/qaxsX6cUizYuDnBluntK72rf2e07ixQf5xe367G TQwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Fimq5sfwhWfTyl+48lRf23Er0RWDMlqe4dm/RRwtmHPioYEF2 YcvHt2ntaZ6W6JXPFdNxSEqGFzTl57Vr4A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRaKX7OTYugisAmPul3swYoeG5PGDq9jTHGT8iCgQ/6ljUXpjHBbaAdeaCpt1P9ubAa+hSsg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ff48:: with SMTP id zo8mr1005133ejb.424.1623999061845; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 23:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (217-149-169-135.nat.highway.telekom.at. [217.149.169.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gx28sm630046ejc.107.2021.06.17.23.51.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 23:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8b8fed1d71a692d9cd72116e42ddde776a12be7e.camel@cybertec.at> Subject: Re: 24.1.5.1. Multixacts And Wraparound From: Laurenz Albe To: eric.mutta@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:51:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <162395467510.686.11947486273299446208@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <162395467510.686.11947486273299446208@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 18:31 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > In section "24.1.5.1. Multixacts And Wraparound" of > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/routine-vacuuming.html we find the > following sentence towards the end of the section: > > "...If the amount of used member storage space exceeds the amount 50% of the > addressable storage space." > > I am having trouble parsing "...exceeds the amount 50% of the > addressable..." part. > > It seems like the sentence is trying to say "...space exceeds 50% of the > addressable storage space" or maybe even "...space exceeds the amount of the > addressable storage space". Which is which? +1 I think that the second "the amount" in the sentence should be removed. Yours, Laurenz Albe