X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098B09FB370 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:11:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20033-06 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:10:53 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1179FB371 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:10:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6VJAKDM009050; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:10:20 -0400 (EDT) To: Joe Conway cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? In-reply-to: <44CE529F.2070701@joeconway.com> References: <200607281947.k6SJlOI02533@momjian.us> <473.1154116455@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44CA76A9.8070101@joeconway.com> <44CB051D.6090609@joeconway.com> <21320.1154222840@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26226.1154279741@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44CE529F.2070701@joeconway.com> Comments: In-reply-to Joe Conway message dated "Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:57:35 -0700" Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:10:20 -0400 Message-ID: <9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200607/351 X-Sequence-Number: 20505 Joe Conway writes: > The good news is that from a memory and perfomance standpoint, my simple > test now shows us outperforming mysql: Sweet ;-) I'm up to my *ss in fixing relation locking, but will get back to your thing as soon as that's done. I think you're close enough to qualify as having made the feature freeze deadline, in any case. regards, tom lane