X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3919D1B523 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 15:30:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99877-03 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 11:29:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B945AD1B4E6 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 11:29:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from myrealbox.com grzm@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [61.116.208.113] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.44 $ on Novell NetWare; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 08:29:57 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:29:53 +0900 Subject: Re: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Michael Glaesemann To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3252.1068390999@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-Id: <90EE01BD-12C9-11D8-A551-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/15 X-Sequence-Number: 2092 On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 12:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Glaesemann writes: >> I was feeling particularly organizational today and redrew one of the >> figures from the documentation. In the PostgreSQL 7.3 PDF >> documentation, it's the System Catalogs Diagram, or Figure 3. The >> major >> POSTGRES system catalogs. > > Peter just removed all those figures because they were so out-of-date > as > to be useless. If you redrew from the figure rather than from looking > at the actual catalogs documentation, I fear your version is too :-(. I guessed that was the case. However, it's easier to change once I've got the data than starting from scratch. > So if you want to submit something, I'd ask that it be generated with > open-source > tools and that it come with an explanation of how to modify and > regenerate it. Well, looks like I'm 0-2. I used InDesign, which is a *long* way from open source. I can definitely understand that being able to maintain it is a virtue. If you'd like to include an up-to-date version, knowing you might have to throw it out at a later date when it gets too old to be useful, I'm willing to make the changes. I'm not familiar enough with open source graphic design tools to know what to use. :( Might something be better than nothing? I know it's not the best situation, but the offer's still good. Michael grzm myrealbox com