public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Volkan YAZICI <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:52:29 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Really?  Do we intend applications to call it?

> Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> applications to call it, why is it there?

If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
with no documentation?

			regards, tom lane

view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox