Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T0FoQ-0008VF-Fb for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:49:22 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T0FoP-0002Aq-JG for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:49:21 +0000 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7BHnK1s009179; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:49:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Lane To: Jeff Janes cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Documentation cross reference from copy to \copy In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Jeff Janes message dated "Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:24:06 -0700" Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:49:20 -0400 Message-ID: <9178.1344707360@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201208/8 X-Sequence-Number: 7401 Jeff Janes writes: > Where the SQL COPY command warns us not to confuse it with \copy, a > link to \copy would be useful. The attached patch implements that, > but I'm not sure it does so in the preferred way. It seems reasonable from here. I thought at first that it might break the man-page output, but AFAICT there is no effect on that. regards, tom lane