Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0736321ED
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:47:02 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 19209-02 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:46:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EE0633ECD
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:46:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o2VNknMc000938;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:46:49 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example 
In-reply-to: <201003312345.o2VNjGW24641@momjian.us> 
References: <201003312345.o2VNjGW24641@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:45:16 -0400"
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:46:49 -0400
Message-ID: <937.1270079209@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.464 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.135,
	BAYES_00=-2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201003/27
X-Sequence-Number: 5392

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> What about:
>  	archive_command = 'test ! -f ...%f &amp;&amp; cp %p ...%f'

Perhaps, though I still think this isn't an improvement over the
original.

			regards, tom lane