Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA31271;
	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 03:07:04 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA09594;
	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 03:07:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <docs@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items 
In-reply-to: <200004130428.AAA06245@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200004130428.AAA06245@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:28:04 -0400"
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 03:07:00 -0400
Message-ID: <9591.955609620@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200004/64

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Here are the open doc items.  Should we consider ecpg.sgml as up-to-date
> as it needs to be for 7.0?

Michael Meskes said he thought the ecpg page was out of date ... but
AFAICS it's his responsibility to update it.  If he doesn't get it
done, is there anyone else qualified to do it?

			regards, tom lane