Received: from mail.postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f17Ddax50642
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:39:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org)
Received: from news.tht.net (news.hub.org [216.126.91.242])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f16J0Lx27885;
	Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:00:21 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from news@news.tht.net)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by news.tht.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f16Ic7L22963;
	Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:38:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from news)
From: "a" <hong@cs.purdue.edu>
X-Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.admin,comp.databases.postgresql.docs
Subject: cocurrent access
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:38:22 -0800
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <95pgab$mdg$1@news.tht.net>
X-Complaints-To: scrappy@hub.org
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org.pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200102/54
X-Sequence-Number: 654

When stress test Postgres,  It can only hold about 200 cocurrent connection
while keep calling DriverManager.getConnection()

Is this number configurable?  Or it is the limitation of postgres?

Any suggestion?

Thanks

Feng