Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkCUK-0001YE-AJ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:52:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkCUJ-0005Rq-SY for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:52:39 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkCUJ-0005RG-3a for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:52:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkCUC-0003ct-F7 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:52:37 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8EFqTwb009637; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:52:29 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alexander Law cc: Alvaro Herrera , =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Docbook 5.x In-reply-to: References: <20160914153047.GA463699@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Law message dated "Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:46:20 +0300" Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:52:29 -0400 Message-ID: <9636.1473868349@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Alexander Law writes: > Hello Alvaro, > 14.09.2016 18:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> What's up with 30? > ecpg.sgml contains "The scope of the allocated descriptor is > WHAT?.", which is printed with XSLT but ignored with DSSSL. > Maybe we can just remove such remarks. I found only two of them, other > one in dml.sgml: > > Data Manipulation > > This chapter is still quite incomplete. > Change them to SGML comments? Although actually the DML one should be removed, I think it's ancient and obsolete. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs