Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28393799300 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:04:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69343-03-2 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:04:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D537992F5 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:04:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so801984fxm.3 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:04:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.5.71 with SMTP id 7mr8846082fau.48.1268849053426; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:04:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3f0b79eb1003161928n6e6a75cp28623c35cad2bb2f@mail.gmail.com> References: <3f0b79eb1003161928n6e6a75cp28623c35cad2bb2f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:04:12 +0100 Message-ID: <9837222c1003171104w1e751c83i3ae3904495c87dc8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit From: Magnus Hagander To: Fujii Masao Cc: pgsql-docs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201003/13 X-Sequence-Number: 5378 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:28, Fujii Masao wrote: > Hi, > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-connection.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-CONNECTION-SECURITY > >> ssl_renegotiation_limit (int) > > It's described that the type of ssl_renegotiation_limit is "int". > Though it's not apparent error, we should use "integer" rather than > "int". In the description of other parameters, "integer" has been > used. Here is the patch. You are right, of course. Applied, thanks! -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/