On May 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
>>> functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
>>>
>>> Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
>>> section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest
>>> of the functions?
>>
>> No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
>
> Yea, I was wondering about that.  I think the best idea would be to
> reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather
> than move them.

Well, pg_backend_pid makes no sense being in with the stats  
functions, so I'll move it. I'll just include references to the other  
stuff.
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)