Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854889FCD0A for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89752-07 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBC89FCD08 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC8BB4759D for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26622-02; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699C2B47599; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2044CC81; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:40 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:46:31 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "Joshua D. Drake" , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: First mention option for Postgres Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20071026132509.288c6795@scratch> References: <20071026132509.288c6795@scratch> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/129 X-Sequence-Number: 12793 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Friday, October 26, 2007 13:25:09 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake" wrote: > Hello, > > I am sure we are all long bored with this thread (on both sides) so I > thought I would offer a compromise. When dealing with long documents it > is quite common to see something like this: > > PostgreSQL hereafter referred to as Postgres > > I propose that we could have the FAQ and the Docs do the same thing. > The very first mention in these documents will same something to the > effect of: > > PostgreSQL hereafter referred to as Postgres, is the kick butt database > of the planet and the dolphin that can't swim doesn't even compare. > > My proposal is not suggesting in *any* way that we change > the following: > > The official project name, which is PostgreSQL > The domain name of the project, which is postgresql.org > > Nor am I in anyway suggesting that we "promote" the name Postgres. If every word in the documentation *except* the very first one states 'Postgres', isn't that "promoting" it? You've just relegated the word "PostgreSQL" to a footnote as far as the documentation itself is concerned ... and for what exactly? To save 2 bytes per occurance? > We > should instead continue our focus on promoting our project which is > PostgreSQL If you are going to promote the name "PostgreSQL", then it should be used on *everything* official, not just as a leader into the documentation ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHIlIn4QvfyHIvDvMRAlkAAJ0fWCx7CzDPplJYdiZEfW863n/TewCfR6IT KXqdiEoL7+8mcDtSDma/fkE= =spu2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----