DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=KWKwXm7yJfHFC0L2f2O6BU6QC7I9UD6mVWBbq82nr8IwZK1rWLYvMIXo9RAo5lSzj5
	Uy9c2ot1MEK2mAF+CVXuO7Xl4DqwaG1Tv/WYFE+1EPRYdwA4EnEAyqjoqcXgbQkkMM6I
	7fv5pJ59bxFx+VT0KLln9eswyKxyWt2sAUTiM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C58B6F6.6030404@pgexperts.com>
References: <4C58B6F6.6030404@pgexperts.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:55:20 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=VHappkpRWMje4e3LtxjKLQbL6xyVmcT7bt-Rf@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Patch for "big features" section of release notes
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh.berkus@pgexperts.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Josh Berkus <josh.berkus@pgexperts.com> wro=
te:
> Attached is a patch re-arranging some of the features in the first part
> of the release notes, as well as adding a few. =A0The additions are based
> on (a) votes on what's a big feature for 9.0, and (b) a desire to match
> the features listed elsewhere, such as the press kit.

This patch reverts a bunch of the changes in Erik Rijkers' previous
doc patch.  Since you didn't mention anything about that, I'm guessing
it was unintentional.  Using git can help avoid these kinds of
mistakes... rebase is your friend.  If it was intentional, let's
discuss.  Anyhow, I've somewhat painstakingly extracted what I believe
to be the intentional changes and am committing those now.  Please
check.

--=20
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company