DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=KjTJmkdVFn1pgdwfXq3X9XZx03mBfwo/CnfyVxoUO3orhmYQ9awSkSAWDZaXiN/GO7
	NzxhoRj7TIpGAhY0oAyo8rAs5JaYSRcJigkb/54Qg/IreKcrDTa4lMpq6SBkGyPybILN
	lbMogu7I1urgeeLNFmi+r/9TYyzV7N5F8Otbw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C42DE5D.90607@usit.uio.no>
References: <201007100001.o6A01to03428@momjian.us>
 <4C3973CF.80608@usit.uio.no>
	<9DCA3CE9-0DF2-4F9B-97A6-3FA538A949FB@blighty.com>
	<AANLkTim15CUgRRS209zEMzYk+iKVPUKRNLdPZZNRzVvX@mail.gmail.com>
	<A3EAEF9D-A9FA-4C33-B2EC-54073F639E7B@blighty.com>
	<7984.1279376823@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4C42D1E6.8000703@usit.uio.no>
	<AANLkTinilCSezIKLbGnxOyR5ezQkTs9XpQISftczvqAu@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C42DE5D.90607@usit.uio.no>
From: Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:29:37 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=rs-DFK4KTFoVPcoSXQGjnOxY6BwK1b+5StQwN@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
To: Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 18 July 2010 11:58, Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> Okay, I just edited an existing dia file: pgclient_server.dia. =A0All I
>> did was change the font size of the text "client application" at the
>> top of the diagram, and changed the properties of a line so the
>> arrowhead was no longer on the end. =A0I used dia 0.97.1 to edit the
>> file. The result when saving is attached in the diff file. =A0That's a
>> lot of file changes for what I did.
>>
>> Thom
>>
>
> Indeed.
>
> The only explanation I can find to this is that I used dia.0.96.1 to
> generate the file and you have used 0.97.1 to edit it.
>
> Almost all changes are to the attributes:
> =A0<dia:rectangle val=3D....
> =A0<dia:point val=3D....
>
> I suspect that these changes have been done because 'something' have
> changed between the two main versions in the way they deal with these
> attributes :(

Has anyone yet come up with a reliable and sensible format we can use?

Thom