Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353231337B88 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:32:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95161-08 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:32:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com (mail-iw0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987DC1337B82 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:32:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so7164846iwn.19 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T4uKn34gAsmCNhNMOUgr0P9ksceDT5iIIED7zeIR4gY=; b=a/fOKOd1QRD6r8OZySwSc9a0RNwKzjvOWkKG/Qb4AGH2hNTjqi9qsf0MnQWnVONFpU /vLvgsxmDuYmucYsH9GPWcw0DIG8SPjJnTgTqcx502PVQ6UD1WqowN+wk0+G+uRmKt1E wTnq//sdAjUGnf5SmgdIDI+IOy0B9U9P/xAsQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=htBfD5BtMdX/qOUgVWh4hjqsf0a8O8phFjuJPcX4RvBTsNIZnGhN+SIU3/98fDtMlI HecbwELcPplpFeeVhFRVTgzovNkk9KPz6Xe7iPbdk/48Oxmkata2TTt+5xcP9S/iZUsW /dKvxrXCemCt4gRbQhoINXCT6xF+JtG4QuHw8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.15.8 with SMTP id i8mr10567106iba.12.1286213554795; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.10.131 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:32:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:32:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting From: Robert Haas To: Thom Brown Cc: pgsql-docs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201010/2 X-Sequence-Number: 6143 On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown wrote: >> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown wrote: >>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I >>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located. =A0Previously >>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. =A0I also >>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area >>> as per this discussion: >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php . >>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page. >>> >>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any >>> unsorted function tables. >> >> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped versio= n. > > Is this on the radar? =A0Copying in -hackers in case. I took a quick look at it before, but it was too much to commit without more scrutiny than I had time to give it. Perhaps it would be useful to decompose this into several patches, and/or add it to the next CF. --=20 Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company