DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=cJO4cmZyBk7UP9JNJ9H0jUEnyAX1Lng+Z+BTKgExtyDgojMF9vKrRVR4alO4YWTUZG
	6A+L5X2J3xw+ssCnynksbXP5VEYMBMgaEwRmVnS2/Zca935dFbSHCseg9b38Wdistbfn
	KBb71+Y+TAeIghkpgVoMVmsI8YcGIpE8nz29g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4D92E773.7000400@enterprisedb.com>
References: <4D92E502.9050804@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<4D92E773.7000400@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:11:34 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimuqRP+=aEKNEoR6cr5Y27CW9XFeT77YCjwUVKL@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: English Grammar question
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 30.03.2011 11:08, Susanne Ebrecht wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> during translation the history.sgml - I found the following sentences in
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/history.html
>>
>> "The design of the rule system at that time was described in /The design
>> of the POSTGRES rules system/
>> <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/biblio.html#STON87A>. The
>> rationale and architecture of the storage manager were detailed in /The
>> design of the POSTGRES storage system
>> <http://db.cs.berkeley.edu/papers/ERL-M87-06.pdf>/"
>>
>> I am not sure if the grammar is correct here.
>>
>> My feeling says it should be:
>>
>> "is decribed" and "are detailed" instead of "was and were"
>>
>> I am pretty sure these books still exist.
>
> Both would be correct, but with a slightly different meaning. What it means
> now is that someone wrote a description of (= described) the design in that
> book. If you change it to "is described", it means that there is a
> description on the (old) design, with nothing said about when the
> description was written.

I think this is a correct analysis of grammar - both are correct, with
slightly different meanings.  I actually find both phrasings a bit
awkward, though.  What we're really trying to do here is provide the
links, but that is sometimes better done in a footnote or bibliography
than in the middle of a body of text.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company