Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED4B9FB3CA for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:54:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14296-01-7 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:54:18 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E0C9FA603 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:54:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [74.8.42.58] (unknown [74.8.42.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by noel.decibel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9735649C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:54:21 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org From: Jim Nasby Subject: Documentation of pg_badkend_pid and stats functions Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:54:24 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/15 X-Sequence-Number: 4211 Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical. Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest of the functions? -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)