DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=DClUgCt3gsNMjlLLrSusP5oq/1pUdTC+UuhL0dlm0scL/3kkFxc4dqs4gTli8ySaBN
	aCTZW+fXaWKM0y28qrKWrfj41ef/AEEI1f8N3WIagoXsRP+vy2vsi2IkXCpyD5tMi3Fd
	sOSRAefsS/JR8kDV37gUQdNFzT0HkmeL8wNlA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1304706536-sup-3669@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <1304702299.28821.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<BANLkTikMnvvYrG6GS_pLvL8p+P6hwG3_Fg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1304706536-sup-3669@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:23:24 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=CqOKQu4aOC9wdLiow6kHgSAiW8A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application?
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of vie may 06 14:30:27 -0300 2011=
:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 19:18, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > The pg_basebackup reference page is currently under "Client
>> > Applications" [0]. =A0I think it's more of a server application, becau=
se
>> > it's what you'd run instead of initdb on the server. =A0Should it be m=
oved
>> > to the "Server Applications" section?
>>
>> Not sure I buy that argument. pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore are under
>> client applications. They're something you run *alongside* initdb and
>> not instead, sure.. But they're all backup tools.
>
> Is there really a dichotomy here? Client/server? =A0Maybe we just need
> another category, "administrative applications" or something like that.

You can draw a clear line between applications which can connect to a
server remotely, and those which need to be executed on the actual
server machine, and thus distinguish "Client" from "Server"
Applications. If we use that logic, I think pg_config should be listed
as a "Server Application" and pg_basebackup should remain a "Client
Application", and we'd be consistent.

I think trying to break the Client Applications down into
administrative and non-administrative isn't very helpful -- the only
client applications I see which are clearly non-administrative (i.e.
non-superusers would normally use) are psql and ecpg. Everything else
seems like stuff you either generally need superuser privs for
(create*, drop*, etc.) or are tools typically used by the server admin
(taking and restoring backups).

Josh