Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA111337B61;
	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 05:24:08 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 09307-02; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 08:24:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com (mail-qw0-f46.google.com
	[209.85.216.46])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E4E1337B43;
	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 05:23:59 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so1997072qwk.19
	for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 01:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=UlwU/7JHq2LDnQHFK/0pYB2rR+8ahOfG+8ZDvxCDYSM=;
	b=rZc8voYbgcQXDACnWBOEEBaTxNOxmJW/s2P7SSJ5bm3ZxXbqYns6kYR8a6JHyx2k+o
	uF1BUcX/LCqc5ChvDKuCZ0YcOhPi7/YifzFeJsbw5xOSLd0tvc9KG3Oh1Tley1KTmOZ5
	OQKKBF6m234ky92cc2RT3OFcieSbehFiH5feQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=ok3Ysmo59siBghpYT5Os3X5i2bwAFv+/gBategqgxXWT/Sa5a+iWFaGrWjYzilDvwS
	9LpAUiE72GzW6nO0k1rd8yktn2V7EJt2MCGf9LDCwX18c1VuoOFNNudYVeqceDyrx5SB
	5SuuAIgCLk7OLVf/ERvjSif3vRCD5liCXjZFE=
Received: by 10.229.66.25 with SMTP id l25mr2590244qci.265.1303028639208; Sun,
	17 Apr 2011 01:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.98.10 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 01:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinxx+YsA3YEmC-vuiPwMnBVZtf5Yg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <OFCDC1B866.8E8ECBF4-ONC125786B.0021822E-C125786B.002287CA@gruppoautostrade.it>
	<BANLkTi=xXUbux=jr_fXwqRcWs8sSidSBKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=3bmt0VgEg09v5Tz88kN-2NpnfDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinxx+YsA3YEmC-vuiPwMnBVZtf5Yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:23:39 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimF4L=7sL9Ew7yw8ueFTn4w5keC3g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org,
	gabriele.garuglieri@infoblu.it, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.898 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RFC_ABUSE_POST=0.001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201104/36
X-Sequence-Number: 19777

2011/4/17 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
>
> On Apr 17, 2011 1:32 AM, "Josh Kupershmidt" <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [CC'ing the -www list, since this affects the PDFs provided by the
>> website. Ugh, and resending without attachments since it looks like
>> the last attempt didn't make it to the list.]
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:15 AM, =A0<gabriele.garuglieri@infoblu.it> wrot=
e:
>> > the 9.0.2 has them, but 9.0.3 pdf documentation is missing the
>> > bookmarks.
>> > When looking for something is a real pain having to always use find or
>> > switch back to TOC pages.
>> >
>> > Any chance that you can generate and republish a corrected doc?
>>
>> Hi Gabriele,
>>
>> Thanks for taking the time to report this, and sorry for the delay in
>> following up. Just to clarify what (I think) Gabriele is complaining
>> about, here [1] is a screenshot from the Okular viewer of the
>> 9.0.3 -A4 or -US PDFs from the website [2]. You can see that the
>> "Contents" pane in the top left is greyed out [3].
>>
>> When I built these PDFs from the 9.0.3 tarball myself, the results
>> looked better [4]. Assuming this fixes Gabriele's problem, could we
>> update the website with the fixed versions [5] of the 9.0.3 PDFs?
>
> Could this be because of the efforts to reduce the size of the pdf's that
> was implemented a while ago?
>
>> Also, I noticed that the page of PDFs is not consistent with the PDF
>> naming scheme wrt. minor version numbers. We provide e.g.
>> "postgresql-8.4.6-A4.pdf" and "postgresql-9.0-A4.pdf". Personally, I
>> like having the minor version number included, but could we just be
>> consistent either way?
>
> We have a standard now, 8.4 just predates it. The standard is without the
> minor version, and the reasining behind this is both that it decreases
> storage requiremeny=E5ts and more imoortant that a new version doesn't
> invalidate all old links, both on our own sites and othets...
>

In http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/  the 8.4 pdf file is the
only one misnamed then.


> /Magnus
>



--=20
C=E9dric Villemain=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/=A0 =A0=A0 PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Suppo=
rt