DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=RAaLFZ3U9+/5pbEGh6cr5uRw7JZEP+VjWeyMBjyw8z5yrhqKgWQcyR6Y5l+Vqo0uCT
	aalVt0lDPXG4YdE43J0KapBa3YJWw+dATBZjmLh8MaOV/c6Was/hmFb3EI8SQ0a7+un7
	5wR8px/lfiRz+BnoJATgnrT9Lflt1N4cTYLb0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin0ztDT2VPQV-UyvK531CZC8mBN9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikovATDon-Nhd1MPo4PytGJEfh5mQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTin0ztDT2VPQV-UyvK531CZC8mBN9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:55:19 +1000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimr4e74cbXu+A7sadUsweWMNmYfNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Add link to current_schemas in config.sgml
From: Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 14 June 2011 02:39, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is just a quick docs patch to add a link to the mention of the
>> current_schemas function from 18.10.1. Statement Behavior.
>
> Your patch got mangled by my email client, but I committed what I
> believe to be the same change.

Thanks Robert, but I think you missed the other part of my posted
patch, which was removing the trailing empty parens from the function
name ("current_schema()" => "current_schema" in two places in that
paragraph).

The paragraph rationalising this, from my original post:

--
I also removed the parentheses after the function name as this was a)
misleading the reader into thinking the function could be called
without arguments and b) inconsistent with the style for referring to
functions elsewhere in the chapter.
--

Was the exclusion deliberate?

Cheers,
BJ