Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A65B5DBD0 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:27:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46537-08 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:27:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14863B5D803 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:27:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com (mail-wy0-f174.google.com [74.125.82.174]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id p61IR4Yt009906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:27:06 -0700 Received: by wyg8 with SMTP id 8so2365183wyg.19 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.81.4 with SMTP id l4mr1596887wee.15.1309544824077; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:27:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.70.149 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:26:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1895.1309544397@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1895.1309544397@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Thom Brown Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 19:26:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Geometric function example results To: Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-docs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201107/3 X-Sequence-Number: 6870 On 1 July 2011 19:19, Tom Lane wrote: > Thom Brown writes: >> I noticed that there are no example outputs shown on the geometric >> functions page (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-geom= etry.html). >> =A0So I've attached a patch which adds them. =A0I'm not entirely sure to >> make of the 2 example outputs that are very large, but they're >> included anyway. > > I think this is unworkable, because those tables are already so wide > they barely fit on a page. =A0This will certainly not work for PDF output= , > and I don't think it'll look very nice in HTML either. Yeah, you're probably right. I didn't even think about the PDF representation, so I guess that's more than enough reason to leave out such examples. --=20 Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company