Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36751336FA7; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 03:57:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72572-04; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 06:57:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com (mail-pw0-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3E213364DE; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 03:57:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so1710000pwi.19 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:57:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.9.38 with SMTP id w6mr4438694pba.431.1303023437419; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.59.42 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.59.42 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:57:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References:

Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 08:57:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks From: Magnus Hagander To: Josh Kupershmidt Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, gabriele.garuglieri@infoblu.it, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52163a71f140a04a117c9cd X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.899 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201104/35 X-Sequence-Number: 19776 --bcaec52163a71f140a04a117c9cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Apr 17, 2011 1:32 AM, "Josh Kupershmidt" wrote: > > [CC'ing the -www list, since this affects the PDFs provided by the > website. Ugh, and resending without attachments since it looks like > the last attempt didn't make it to the list.] > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:15 AM, wrote: > > the 9.0.2 has them, but 9.0.3 pdf documentation is missing the bookmarks. > > When looking for something is a real pain having to always use find or > > switch back to TOC pages. > > > > Any chance that you can generate and republish a corrected doc? > > Hi Gabriele, > > Thanks for taking the time to report this, and sorry for the delay in > following up. Just to clarify what (I think) Gabriele is complaining > about, here [1] is a screenshot from the Okular viewer of the > 9.0.3 -A4 or -US PDFs from the website [2]. You can see that the > "Contents" pane in the top left is greyed out [3]. > > When I built these PDFs from the 9.0.3 tarball myself, the results > looked better [4]. Assuming this fixes Gabriele's problem, could we > update the website with the fixed versions [5] of the 9.0.3 PDFs? Could this be because of the efforts to reduce the size of the pdf's that was implemented a while ago? > Also, I noticed that the page of PDFs is not consistent with the PDF > naming scheme wrt. minor version numbers. We provide e.g. > "postgresql-8.4.6-A4.pdf" and "postgresql-9.0-A4.pdf". Personally, I > like having the minor version number included, but could we just be > consistent either way? We have a standard now, 8.4 just predates it. The standard is without the minor version, and the reasining behind this is both that it decreases storage requiremeny=E5ts and more imoortant that a new version doesn't invalidate all old links, both on our own sites and othets... /Magnus --bcaec52163a71f140a04a117c9cd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 17, 2011 1:32 AM, "Josh Kupershmidt" <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [CC'ing the -www list, since this affects the PDFs provided by the=
> website. Ugh, and resending without attachments since it looks like > the last attempt didn't make it to the list.]
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:15 AM, =A0<gabriele.garuglieri@infoblu.it> wrote:
> > the 9.0.2 has them, but 9.0.3 pdf documentation is missing the bo= okmarks.
> > When looking for something is a real pain having to always use fi= nd or
> > switch back to TOC pages.
> >
> > Any chance that you can generate and republish a corrected doc? >
> Hi Gabriele,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to report this, and sorry for the delay in<= br> > following up. Just to clarify what (I think) Gabriele is complaining > about, here [1] is a screenshot from the Okular viewer of the
> 9.0.3 -A4 or -US PDFs from the website [2]. You can see that the
> "Contents" pane in the top left is greyed out [3].
>
> When I built these PDFs from the 9.0.3 tarball myself, the results
> looked better [4]. Assuming this fixes Gabriele's problem, could w= e
> update the website with the fixed versions [5] of the 9.0.3 PDFs?

Could this be because of the efforts to reduce the size of the pdf's= that was implemented a while ago?

> Also, I noticed that the page of PDFs is not consistent with the PD= F
> naming scheme wrt. minor version numbers. We provide e.g.
> "postgresql-8.4.6-A4.pdf" and "postgresql-9.0-A4.pdf&qu= ot;. Personally, I
> like having the minor version number included, but could we just be > consistent either way?

We have a standard now, 8.4 just predates it. The standard is without th= e minor version, and the reasining behind this is both that it decreases st= orage requiremeny=E5ts and more imoortant that a new version doesn't in= validate all old links, both on our own sites and othets...

/Magnus

--bcaec52163a71f140a04a117c9cd--