MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMsr+YFq3AyOdiQc_EcXF49QEnU3VWpMK9LTzJ+hy-FuBbb6FQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMsr+YFq3AyOdiQc_EcXF49QEnU3VWpMK9LTzJ+hy-FuBbb6FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:35:31 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CA+TgmoYe3-XHazbJf6wc7Bwjtoo-_UGkh=d6p1FJh0mCRrmEMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bgworker / SPI docs patches
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> After spending a while working on the BDR extension I've found that the
> current documentation on the SPI and bgworkers could use some more detail.
>
> In the process I've put cross reference labels in for most chapter headings,
> as I got sick of seeing "Chapter 33" (or whatever) everywhere in the docs.
> I'd like to progressively add them to every section, refentry, chapter, etc
> that has an id.
>
> I hope this is useful.

Per Peter, 0001 is not wanted.  I tend to agree with him on that point
of style.  Patch 0002 makes the docs build fail unless 0001 is applied
first, so I can't pursue that unless you want to revise that
accordingly.  I've committed 0003, and will look at 0004 next.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs