MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAK3UJRF-G6MHuzi5iVf-eLdDiFAo7pbFUJ-YOPcaZhmXeZCqHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAK3UJRELGc4v_aoRstG8kY0JfCrt4xNUeW=uxtnwPSZ4zV5nMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK3UJRESXhFVwCT5VyDrngoV21U2Wojv6c7EpUUQfWMKCainZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABUevEzJZZTZdwoD1b1-=ss_A+T0XYGckuKBx3os_ZLjCk1BnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK3UJRF-G6MHuzi5iVf-eLdDiFAo7pbFUJ-YOPcaZhmXeZCqHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:13:32 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABUevEwJ_rmP0D3BXfk60zgETKStAy8-gs+V_7ih65-zv1Uq3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: streaming replication confusion
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>> I've shuffled around the Synchronous replication page, and made some
>>> changes to Streaming Replication, though the latter could probably use
>>> some further pruning. Could someone take a look at the small
>>> documentation patch?
>>
>> Was that message supposed to contain a second patch, or were you just
>> referring to the one you sent back in November?
>
> I was referring to the initial patch sent in November.

Ok, thanks for confirming. Applied and backpatched.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs