public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Artem Gavrilov <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Inaccurate statement about log shipping replication mode
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 13:51:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFPkQKyGw+dnWZQM6QsqXWY_czqvvwMvF9Qfb4x916ZzHiRHeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 1:20 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yep, the original statement is rather inexact.  Now, your new wording
> does not make me really comfortable with the case of cascading stanbys
> in scope, because the asynchronous property applies to them all the
> time.


This is another unclear part. As I understand in configuration `Master
-> Upstream -> Downstream` replication between Master And Upstream
still can be synchronous, while between Upstream and Downstream is't
always async. Am I wrong here?

--

Artem Gavrilov
Senior Software Engineer, Percona

[email protected]

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Inaccurate statement about log shipping replication mode
  In-Reply-To: <CAFPkQKyGw+dnWZQM6QsqXWY_czqvvwMvF9Qfb4x916ZzHiRHeA@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox