public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Pg Docs <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: "GIN and GiST Index Types" page is about usage in full text search, but looks general purpose
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:34:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH2-WzkjN2aYQJddOSPZ-KC894QahxpzJWSe4HLtz0U0gGpQeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CAH2-Wz=+5kzq8A6Uo_t7F0URwztb74-O+UuFcAh1iixTME-WXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAH2-Wzm-YYq2f1Hy7HoazKmC6co3YmYKArN1civ20PnCSVHpBA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:28 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Proposed patch attached.  The existing text already says "GIN indexes are
> the preferred text search index type", so I'm not sure we need to go
> further than that about guiding people which one to use.  In particular,
> since GIN can't support included columns, we can't really deprecate GiST
> altogether here.

LGTM.

> > There is always the extreme option of excluding older versions in
> > robots.txt. I bet that would work.
>
> Yeah, I was wondering about that too.  It's sort of the nuclear option,
> but if we don't want to modify EOL'd versions then we may not have any
> other way to keep Google from glomming onto them.

I think that our recent decision to just live with the downsides that
go with making the most recent stable release docs canonical was a
wise one, on balance. The reality is that we have very few ways of
influencing search results from Google.

I don't know enough about the topic to be able to claim that the
robots.txt solution would also work out well, in about the same way.
But I suspect that it might, and know that it's a reversible process.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan





reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: "GIN and GiST Index Types" page is about usage in full text search, but looks general purpose
  In-Reply-To: <CAH2-WzkjN2aYQJddOSPZ-KC894QahxpzJWSe4HLtz0U0gGpQeQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox